Michigan Dems abolish panel that gives industry say in regulations
Democrats lauded the bill’s passage, saying it would remove an unnecessary layer of bureaucracy that baked significant delays to the rulemaking process.
“Removing this bureaucracy leads to better decisions being made quicker,” Sen. Jeremy Moss, D-Southfield, said in a Senate floor speech.
Related:
But Republicans decried the move as “allowing bureaucracy to run wild” with regulations that could drive business out of Michigan and unfairly shut businesses and residents out of the regulatory process.
“You want to reform them, you want to give them more teeth, you want to give them a shorter timeline to get things done, let’s do it,” Sen. Ed McBroom, an Upper Peninsula Republican, told his colleagues. “But to just go back the way it was, and let the bureaucracy run roughshod over the citizens of this state more is a dynamically foolish mistake.”
Here’s what to know:
- What the committee does
- Why Democrats want to abolish it
- Other similar bills are under consideration
What the committee does
The Environmental Rules Review Committee is one of three oversight boards created during the administration of former Republican Gov. Rick Snyder that gave industry a greater voice in state decision making.
It is made up of appointees, including industry representatives, who vet new rules proposed by the state Department of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy.
When EGLE proposes a rule, the committee gets to review a draft and request changes. The committee also has the power to reject proposed rules, forcing EGLE to either work with the committee to resolve the dispute or submit a report to the governor defending its decision.
The rulemaking process can then proceed only if the governor sides with EGLE.
Why Democrats want to abolish it
Democrats and environmentalists have long decried the boards as “polluter panels,” arguing that allowing polluting industries to oversee environmental regulations is akin to letting the fox guard the hen house.
They also say the review boards waste public time and money by adding an extra step to an already-tedious regulatory process.
But proponents of the review panels argue their existence keeps state regulators honest, dissuading them from writing poorly-crafted regulations that outside groups are likely to challenge.
Other similar bills are under consideration
Senate Bills 393 and 394, sponsored by Sen. Rosemary Bayer, D-Beverly Hills, would do away with the Environmental Science Advisory Board and the Environmental Permit Review Commission. Like the rules review committee, both boards were created in 2018 to give outside parties new ways to influence state decision making.
source
Disclaimer: The use of videoreddit.edu.vn and the content generated on this website is at your own risk. The platform is not responsible for the use that users may make of the content presented here. Although we make every effort to ensure that the information provided is accurate and appropriate, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness or relevance of the content.
The website is not responsible for any loss, damage or harm that may arise from the use of this site, including, but not limited to, direct, indirect, incidental, consequential or punitive damages. Users are responsible for their own actions and compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.
In addition, videoreddit.edu.vn is not responsible for user-generated content or opinions expressed by users. We reserve the right to remove any content that we deem inappropriate, offensive or that violates our policies or applicable laws, without prior notice.